Skip to main content

% COGS of Product Revenue

What a product cost to make, as a share of what it really earned after markdowns.

60 second readAppears on: Products, Agency View

What it means

% COGS of Product Revenue is a product's cost of goods divided by its Product Revenue, expressed as a percentage. Product Revenue is Gross Sales minus Product Discounts, and it includes tax. So the denominator is what the product earned after markdowns came off — not its list-price value.

That single choice is what separates it from the app's other Shopify cost-share column, % COGS, which divides by Gross Sales. This one has seen your discounts. That one hasn't.

Show the math

Formula and a worked example
% COGS = COGS ÷ Product Revenue

COGS is what the units cost you, taken from the cost price held against each variant.

Product Revenue is Gross Sales minus Product Discounts, tax included. Gross Sales is item price × quantity, before any discount.

Worked example. A product sells 400 units at €50, so Gross Sales is €20,000. You gave €4,000 of product discounts, so Product Revenue is €16,000. The units cost €14 each, so COGS is €5,600. % COGS of Product Revenue = 5,600 ÷ 16,000 = 35%.

Run the same €5,600 against the pre-discount €20,000 and you get 28%. Same product, same supplier, same month — seven points apart, and the whole gap is the markdown. 28% is what % COGS% COGSLower % generally means better product margins. would report for the same product, because that column divides by Gross Sales.

It answers the question

Of the money this product actually brought in, how much of it was the product? It's the first cut taken out of what you banked, and it's the version of the cost ratio that a discount can move.

Why it matters

This is the cost share you can act on, because it responds to both things you control. Negotiate the unit cost down and it falls. Stop discounting the line and it falls too. A cost ratio measured against list price only ever answers the first half.

It's also the fair way to rank a mixed catalogue. A €9 accessory and a €300 coat can't be compared on profit in euros, but they can be compared on how much of their earned revenue went straight back out to the supplier, and that ranking is what tells you which lines are worth pushing.

One thing to hold in mind: tax sits inside Product Revenue. In a market where prices include VAT, the denominator carries money that was never yours, so the ratio reads a little kinder than the true cost share. The effect is consistent month to month, so trends stay reliable even where the level runs flattering.

What good looks like

35%55%
HealthyNeeds work
Under 35%Your product costs are low against sales.
BetweenProduct costs are middling. There's margin to reclaim on supply and pricing.
Over 55%Product costs eat most of your sales. This calls for a rethink of sourcing and pricing.

These bands assume every variant has a real cost price against it. A product with no cost synced reads 0% and drags the whole table's average down with it, so check the blanks before you trust the colour. Beyond that the honest target is your own category: a private-label line and a resold one can both work at completely different cost shares. The Product COGS table also states that cost figures update only at the end of the day, so today's row is incomplete by design — compare closed periods, not this morning.

How to improve it

LeverWhat you doExpectHow longWatch out for
Fast
Fill in the missing cost prices
Sync variant costs from Shopify so every line has a real number behind itThe column becomes true, and often uglierSame weekA blank cost reads as free and quietly flatters every profit figure built on it, so the whole page gets worse before it gets right.
Fast
Pull the discount off the worst lines
Stop automatic markdowns on the products sitting highest in this columnThe denominator grows, so the cost share falls1–2 weeksUnits usually fall with the discount. Watch Quantity on those lines for a month before deciding the trade was worth it.
Slow
Buy deeper on what actually turns
Move to larger order quantities on your fastest sellers to earn a lower unit costCost share falls on those lines and stays down1–2 quartersCash locked in stock, plus markdown risk if demand turns before the depth sells through — which lands right back in this column.
Slow
Shift the mix toward the cheaper-to-make lines
Point merchandising and ad budget at the products with the lowest cost shareThe blended figure falls with no product changing1–2 quartersYou're steering demand rather than fixing cost, so total units can fall while the ratio improves. Check the volume on the lines you starve.

Every lever costs something somewhere. The last column is the one to read twice.

Read it with

This column already knows about your discounting. Reading it against the discount column is what tells you whether cost or markdown moved it.

% COGS of Product Revenue and % Product Discounts, month over month on Products
Cost share down
Cost share up
% Product Discounts down

Margin from both ends

Cost took less of the revenue and you didn't hand it back at the till. Usually one supplier change or one pricing decision rather than a trend.

Work out what changed and repeat it on the next product.

Discounting hid a cost rise

You markdowned less and the cost share still climbed, so the increase is real and on the supply side. Nothing about trading explains this one.

Check the unit cost against last quarter's.
% Product Discounts up

Bought volume with margin

Odd combination, and it usually means the mix shifted toward cheaper-to-make products during a promotion. Deliberate in a clearance, expensive as a habit.

Confirm the extra units were worth the points you gave away.

Squeezed at both ends

Costs rose and you discounted harder to keep units moving. This is the corner where doing nothing has a price attached.

Sort the table by cost share and start at the top row.
% COGS of Product Revenue + % Product Discounts% Product DiscountsHow heavily a product is marked down.Under 8% is healthy

Product Discounts sit in this column's denominator, so the two move together by construction. When cost share climbs and the discount share climbed first, you've found the cause on the same row. When cost share climbs and discounts held flat, the supplier moved.

% COGS of Product Revenue + QuantityQuantityThe core volume measure across products.

Cost share and volume, side by side. A punishing cost share on a product carrying twelve units a month is a rounding error. The same share on your best seller is where the money is going. Neither number ranks your problems without the other.

Common misreads

“It reads 0%, so this product costs nothing to make.”

It means no cost price is synced against the variant. A blank cost reads as free here and inflates every profit number built on top of it.

“This should match the % COGS figure elsewhere in the app.”

They divide by different things. % COGS uses Gross Sales, before discounts; this uses Product Revenue, after them. On identical costs this column always reads higher, and the gap between them is exactly what you gave away.

“35% cost share means I keep 65%.”

Only product cost is in this ratio. Shipping, payment fees, advertising and everything you enter in Cost Settings all sit outside it, and any of them can turn a comfortable cost share into a loss.

Also called

Cost of goods as a share of net product revenue · COGS ratio · product cost share

See yoursCost share for every product, in the same row as Gross Sales, Product Revenue, Quantity and the discount columns.

Open Products